<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Design &#8211; 3.8.2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/03/07/information-design-3-8-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/03/07/information-design-3-8-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luce</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/03/07/information-design-3-8-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Luce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=302#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if I&#039;m way off base to read in the following passage you wrote a sense of mixing as we&#039;ve encountered in Datacloud as well as in Social History:

&quot;Like Salvo and Rosinski, Brooke argues for the place of rhetoric in a world of new media; however, Brooke also notes how that place will need to be revised in light of the possibilities of new media.  He states, that the development of a rhetoric of new media must avoid “examining the choices that have already been made by writers” and instead concentrate on preparing writers to &#039;make our own choices&#039; (15).  I see this claim as something reflection on Salvo and Rosinski’s work in that it recognizes that we must, as technical communicators, continue to examine the choices made by document designers; however, the new world of information design will also expect us to be able to &#039;make our own choices&#039; concerning document design and deployment.

In other words, I guess what I&#039;m wondering is if the focus on choice here isn&#039;t a way to highlight the re-appropriation of information rather than the invention of information in the most traditional sense of the word. While I&#039;m over-simplifying the process that Carliner points to, for example, as information design, I can&#039;t help but see in the process of information design a kind of arrangement rather than a composition. Am I even close to a direction that gets me somewhere good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if I&#8217;m way off base to read in the following passage you wrote a sense of mixing as we&#8217;ve encountered in Datacloud as well as in Social History:</p>
<p>&#8220;Like Salvo and Rosinski, Brooke argues for the place of rhetoric in a world of new media; however, Brooke also notes how that place will need to be revised in light of the possibilities of new media.  He states, that the development of a rhetoric of new media must avoid “examining the choices that have already been made by writers” and instead concentrate on preparing writers to &#8216;make our own choices&#8217; (15).  I see this claim as something reflection on Salvo and Rosinski’s work in that it recognizes that we must, as technical communicators, continue to examine the choices made by document designers; however, the new world of information design will also expect us to be able to &#8216;make our own choices&#8217; concerning document design and deployment.</p>
<p>In other words, I guess what I&#8217;m wondering is if the focus on choice here isn&#8217;t a way to highlight the re-appropriation of information rather than the invention of information in the most traditional sense of the word. While I&#8217;m over-simplifying the process that Carliner points to, for example, as information design, I can&#8217;t help but see in the process of information design a kind of arrangement rather than a composition. Am I even close to a direction that gets me somewhere good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/03/07/information-design-3-8-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=302#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Justin, I see where you&#039;re going with the readings (at least I think I&#039;m mapping your trajectory). I&#039;ve not yet read Collin&#039;s book, but it sounds like he&#039;s making a call similar to what we&#039;ve read in 760 the last few weeks. It&#039;s this sort of rethinking and revision of what it means to write -- anything -- in digital environments. In 760, our emphasis is on rethinking the role of the technical communicator and the shape (depth and breadth) of the discipline. Outside of tech comm proper, we have all of these technology-mediated spaces in which we communicate and create texts, search for and locate information, and make meaning from all sorts of data. So maybe what we&#039;re seeing across these readings is really an imagining of what it means to be literate at all, regardless of disciplines, practices, roles, jobs, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I see where you&#8217;re going with the readings (at least I think I&#8217;m mapping your trajectory). I&#8217;ve not yet read Collin&#8217;s book, but it sounds like he&#8217;s making a call similar to what we&#8217;ve read in 760 the last few weeks. It&#8217;s this sort of rethinking and revision of what it means to write &#8212; anything &#8212; in digital environments. In 760, our emphasis is on rethinking the role of the technical communicator and the shape (depth and breadth) of the discipline. Outside of tech comm proper, we have all of these technology-mediated spaces in which we communicate and create texts, search for and locate information, and make meaning from all sorts of data. So maybe what we&#8217;re seeing across these readings is really an imagining of what it means to be literate at all, regardless of disciplines, practices, roles, jobs, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  justinlewis.me/me/2010/03/07/information-design-3-8-2010/feed/ ) in 0.48098 seconds, on May 19th, 2012 at 2:40 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2012 at 3:40 am UTC -->
