<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>epiphonema &#187; arrangement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinlewis.me/me/tag/arrangement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinlewis.me/me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gage &#8211; An Adequate Epistemology for Composition: Classical and Modern Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/08/gage-adequate-epistemology-composition-classical-modern-perspectives/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/08/gage-adequate-epistemology-composition-classical-modern-perspectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[18th Century Rhetoric / 17th Century Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bellistristic rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialectic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enthymeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stasis theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stylistic rhetoric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=1796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gage, John. &#8220;An Adequate Epistemology for Composition: Classical and Modern Perspectives.&#8221; Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Ed. Robert Conners, Lisa Ede, and Andrea Lunsford. Carbondale: Souther Illinois UP, 1984. 152-73. Print. (PN175 .E84 1984) Trajectory of article:  1) the implications for rhetoric of differing epistemologies; 2) demonstrate how particular epistemological assumptions undergird both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/08/gage-adequate-epistemology-composition-classical-modern-perspectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berlin &#8211; Richard Whately and Current-Traditional Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/07/berlin-richard-whately-currenttraditional-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/07/berlin-richard-whately-currenttraditional-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[18th Century Rhetoric / 17th Century Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th century composition pedagogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-T rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composition textbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current traditional rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managerial rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whately]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Berlin, James. &#8220;Richard Whately and Current-Traditional Rhetoric.&#8221; College English 42  (1980): 10-17. Print. YES In this article Berlin argues that Whately was the primary force for shaping the teaching of writing during the 20th century. Relying on Richard Young, Berlin identified C-T rhetoric as the primary paradigm of writing instruction during the 20th century.  C-T [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2011/09/07/berlin-richard-whately-currenttraditional-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longinus &#8211; On the Sublime (partial)</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/12/08/longinus-sublime-partial/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/12/08/longinus-sublime-partial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCR634 (AR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mimesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sublimity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longinus – On the Sublime Sublimity is the location of the mean by defining the extremes (xiii) Chapter 7 seems particularly important.  In this section Longinus discusses the relationship between rhetoric and moral worth and also notes that the sublime must stand the test of time.  Chapter 8 goes on to discuss how sublimity is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/12/08/longinus-sublime-partial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ettlich &#8211; Theories of Invention in Late 19th Century American Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/27/ettlich-theories-invention-late-19th-century-american-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/27/ettlich-theories-invention-late-19th-century-american-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCR634 (AR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorical invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th century rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cicero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classical invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current-traditional pedagogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quintillian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorica ad herennium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorical cannons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subjective invention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ettlich, Ernest Earl.  &#8220;Theories of Invention in Late Nineteenth Century American Rhetoric.&#8221;  Western Speech Journal 30 (1966):  233-241. E. notes that the topic of rhetorical invention has long been problematic/contested.  E. observes that Ramus’ revision of the liberal arts curriculum during the 1500s was the most serious challenge to rhetorical invention (classically conceived) before the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/27/ettlich-theories-invention-late-19th-century-american-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhetorica ad Herennium</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/25/rhetorica-ad-herennium/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/25/rhetorica-ad-herennium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCR634 (AR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorical invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cicero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmatio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confutatio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divisio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exordium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorical handbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roman rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/me/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pseudo-Ciceronian Rhetorica ad Herenium (paginations are from the Harry Caplan/Harvard UP edition 1964). The text dates from sometime in the 90s BCE.  The piece is one of the first to explain a Latin system of style; further, it was also responsible for the codification of argument into a standard format consisting of exordium (like the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2010/10/25/rhetorica-ad-herennium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  justinlewis.me/me/tag/arrangement/feed/ ) in 0.46040 seconds, on May 21st, 2012 at 6:51 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2012 at 7:51 pm UTC -->
