<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>epiphonema &#187; public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinlewis.me/me/tag/public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinlewis.me/me</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CCR601 &#8211; R&amp;P 42.3</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/11/09/ccr601-rp-42-3/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/11/09/ccr601-rp-42-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCR601]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterpublic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialectic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialectical-rhetorical transcendance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habermas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heidegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bayer, Thora I. &#8220;Hegelian Rhetoric.&#8221; Philosophy and Rhetoric 42.3 (2009): 203-19. Print Rhetoric is an antistrophe to dialectic (antistrophe is the “turning back” of the chorous on the audience in the traditional ancient Greek play). Kant considered dialectic the “logic of illusion” that occurs when reason takes its powers beyond experience to make claims concerning [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/11/09/ccr601-rp-42-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCR 691 &#8211; Welch Ch. 2 for Comment</title>
		<link>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/10/18/ccr-691-welch-ch-2-for-comment/</link>
		<comments>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/10/18/ccr-691-welch-ch-2-for-comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCR691]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neoliberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinlewis.me/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chapter Two:  Ain’t Nobody’s Business? Main Claim / Executive Summary Welch engages a lot of issues in Chapter Two; however, her main concern seems to be the distinctions (and misrepresentations) of “public” and “private.”  Welch argues that because “private” matters aren’t to be discussed, the trend toward “privatization” in the public sphere is a strategic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://justinlewis.me/me/2009/10/18/ccr-691-welch-ch-2-for-comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  justinlewis.me/me/tag/public/feed/ ) in 0.38144 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 11:40 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 12:40 am UTC -->
