My Twitter Feed

@LCandersonn @cblackburne just email yourself and me a copy to use in class. :-)

Laufer – New Rhetoric’s Empire: Pragmatism, Dogmatism, and Sophism

Citation: Laufer, Romain. “New Rhetoric’s Empire : Pragmatism, Dogmatism, and Sophism.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 42.4 (2009): 326-48. Print. Abstract: The author discusses the concepts of pragmatism, dogmatism and sophism. He presents a comparison between the concepts of pragmatism and rationalism, and the relationship between pragmatism and sophism. He cites interpretation from various French sociologists which includes Emile Durkheim... Read More

Cain – Shame and Ambiguity in Plato’s Gorgias

Citation: Cain, R. Bensen. “Shame and Ambiguity in Plato’s Gorgias.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 41.3 (2008): 212-37. Print. Abstract: The article looks at examples of ambiguity and shame evident in Plato’s “Gorgias,” a dialogue involving a man of the same name, Callicles, and Polus. Shame is differentiated into types; that which is naturally shameful and that which is shameful by way of convention. The author looks... Read More

Jenks – The Sounds of Silence: Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Refutation of Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias

Citation: Jenks, Rod. “The Sounds of Silence: Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Refutation of Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 40.2 (2007): 201-15. Print. Abstract: The article discusses Socrates’ attempt to refute Callicles in Plato’s “Gorgias.” The  author argues that Socrates’ representation of ethics and moral psychology, thought to be an inadequate refute to Callicles’... Read More

Chapter One from Conley – Rhetoric in the European Tradition

Chapter One from:  Conley, Thomas.  Rhetoric in the European Tradition.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Conley begins by highlighting two important details from a scene in Homer’s Odyssey: 1) public discussion – with debate and consensus – was the traditional method for making decisions in ancient Greece; and 2) the ethos of the speaker is instrumental in the resolution of conflict/problems. Conley also highlights how language is... Read More

Muckelbauer – The Future of Invention

Muckelbauer – The Future of Invention Chapter One – “The Problem of Change” Muckelbauer situates his book around one premise: the supposedly distinct scholarly approaches of humanism/postmodernism, foundationalism/anti-foundationalism, universalism/relativism have all hinge on a dialectical notion of change.  This means that if change is dialectical, every “new” reading academics perform is merely a negation of an existing reading. .... Read More